Community indicators projects are a growing phenomenon
around the nation and the world. Reliable and accurate
data is an integral component of informed decision-making, and
local decisions require local data. Community indicators
projects are dedicated to the goal of providing accurate
demographic, socioeconomic, and wellbeing data for small, local
geographic areas. Dallas Indicators is proud be part of
this growing community of local data initiatives. In May,
2006, Dallas Indicators was accepted into the National
Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP).
NNIP provides a forum for community indicators projects from around
the country to exchange ideas, share best practices, learn from
each other, and work together to solve common problems.
In a recent article
entitled, "The Use and (Misuses) of Social Indicators: Implications
for Public Policy", authors Moore, Brown, and Scarupa of Child
Trends, a non-profit non-partisan children's research organization,
put forth the argument that social indicators, when used properly,
can be valuable tools for policy makers, practitioners, the media,
and the general public. These authors suggest that social
indicators are widely used because they serve a number of purposes
such as:
- informing citizens and policy makers about the
circumstances of their society, tracking trends and patterns, and
identifying areas of concern, as well as, positive
outcomes
- tracking outcomes that may or may not require
policy interventions of some kind
- establishing quantifiable thresholds to be met
within a specific time period
- increasing accountability to achieve or improve
outcomes
- informing
others with regards to the practices of communities and individual
programs on an ongoing basis
These authors also suggest that using social indicators
correctly requires attention to the following issues:
- social indicators need to be measured for the
appropriate populations
- social indicators need
to be measured at the appropriate geographic level
- social
indicators need to be well-conceptualized
- social
indicators should not be used to claim credit (or to cast blame)
for societal trends
- social indicators should not be used
to claim credit for program success
- social indicators
should not be used to evaluate the performance of individuals or
programs, without considering the larger context